Assessing the climate impacts of cookstove projects: issues in emissions accounting. Win–win scenarios at the climate–development interface: challenges and opportunities for stove replacement programs through carbon finance. Cookstoves illustrate the need for a comprehensive carbon market. How you count carbon matters: implications of differing cookstove carbon credit methodologies for climate and development cobenefits. Wireless sensors linked to climate financing for globally affordable clean cooking. Getting the numbers right: revisiting woodfuel sustainability in the developing world. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2010).īailis, R., Wang, Y., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A. Carbon Offsetting: An Efficient Way to Reduce Emissions or to Avoid Reducing Emissions? An Investigation and Analysis of Offsetting Design and Practice in India and China. How additional is the clean development mechanism? Analysis of the application of current tools and proposed alternatives. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley (2023). Quality assessment of REDD+ carbon credit projects. Policy Brief: the California Air Resources Board’s US Forest Offset Protocol Underestimates Leakage (Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 2019) Little evidence of management change in California’s forest offset program. University of California, Berkeley (2023). Change 5, 266–272 (2015).ĭefining clean fuels and technologies. The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. We provide recommendations to align methodologies with current science and SDG progress.Ībbafati, C. Gold Standard’s metered methodology, which directly monitors fuel use, is most aligned with our estimates (1.5 times over-credited) and has the largest potential for emission abatement and health benefit. We estimate that our project sample is over-credited 9.2 times. Additionality, leakage, permanence and overlapping claims require more research. We find misalignment, in order of importance, with fraction of non-renewable biomass, firewood–charcoal conversion, stove adoption, stove usage, fuel consumption, stacking (using multiple stoves), rebound and emission factors. Here we conduct a comprehensive, quantitative, quality assessment of offsets by comparing five cookstove methodologies with published literature and our own analysis. However, project emission reductions must be accurately or conservatively estimated to avoid undermining climate action and long-term SDG financing. Attachment: Create a Java Project-p1.Cookstove carbon offset projects can progress multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including climate, energy, health, gender, poverty and deforestation.This worked for me, just within the last 20 minutes when I tried it out. It puts the compiler into a "check package" mode (just a guess, as I don't really know what's going on).Ĭomment out the one-line command in that file, or right-click the file (from within the Project Explorer (?) and select "Delete" (to remove the module-info.java file from the project). That file ("module-info.java") is the problem. When the new project is created, you'll see a file called "module-info.java" has been automatically added under the "src" folder. It seems to cause the compiler to expect that a "package" (whatever that means!) will be specified by the programmer (you & me). Having "Create Module Info" checked seems to create extra work for the programmer. As I mention in the image, the Create New Project dialog probably has "Create Module Info" (?) automatically checked. Let's take a look at the "Create New Project" dialog instead. You are looking at the "Create New Class" dialog.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |